[CALUG] What would YOU do?

[Miguel Centrino]

The time you are wasting trying to hide and obfuscate your code, could be better used to write the C/C+.
 
 The thing to remember:
 If you don't have the time to do it now,
 when are you going to have the time?

Jason Dixon <jason at dixongroup.net> wrote: On Mar 10, 2006, at 8:23 AM, Jason C. Miller wrote:

> For the sake of trying to keep code proprietary in the interim , does
> anybody have any ideas as to how one could maintain the scripts in
> a way that would make it difficult for someone else to understand
> the logic that executes within them?
>
> As an example, I considered writing the scripts in PERL
> and using perlcc to compile the scripts into system binaries.  This  
> would
> allow me to maintain the scripts for development but deploy them as
> binaries for delivery. However, in the past, I haven't been very  
> pleased
> with the perl compiler and would be happy to avoid it.

As a pragmatic Perl developer, I would think its native syntactical  
quirks would be enough to obfuscate its intent without any additional  
compilation.  ;-)

--
Jason Dixon
DixonGroup Consulting
http://www.dixongroup.net



_______________________________________________
Columbia, Maryland Linux User's Group (CALUG) mailing list
CALUG Website: http://www.calug.com
Email postings to: lug at calug.com
Change your list subscription options: http://calug.com/mailman/listinfo/lug


		
---------------------------------
Yahoo! Mail
Bring photos to life! New PhotoMail  makes sharing a breeze. 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://calug.com/pipermail/lug/attachments/20060310/e6c3b48b/attachment.html