[CALUG] modems for Linux
Scott Kitterman
sklist at kitterman.com
Sat Aug 19 02:56:23 CDT 2006
I think the difference is that I've got their static IP setup. I don't
know for sure, but I think they are significantly different. The router
they gave me was a standard D-Link DI-624.
Of course I just got the connection Thursday. I may have a different story
to tell once I've used it more.
Scott K
...... Original Message .......
On Fri, 18 Aug 2006 22:02:37 -0400 Abraham Bloom <abrahambloom at verizon.net>
wrote:
>Good Evening,
>
> I got my FIOS a while ago and I have a different story to tell.
>
> I had comcast cable connected to a linux firewall eth0 with the eth1
>card connected to my internal hub. Worked great with dhcp from comcast.
>
> Now with FIOS - you have PPPOE. I get the 15 up and 2 down, real
>sweet. The router that they provide is 'special', I tried to replace
>it and my firewall with numerous different router/firewall
>appliances. Bottom line, none of them gave me the speed of the silly
>DLimk. Reason is the, according to verizon tech support, the DLink
>that they supply (nothing off the shelf) has special code burned
>into it that gives it that speed. So I hook the fios to the
>DLink, my firewall eth0 to the DLink and the eth1 to the multiport
>hub. Everything works well and good speed.
>
> Hope this helps. If anyone knows anything different I am open to
>trying something else.
>
> Abraham
>
>
> Verizon
>On Aug 18, 2006, at 10:05 AM, Eldon Ziegler wrote:
>
>> Great, glad to hear it.
>>
>> On Thu, 2006-08-17 at 23:10 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>>> I just got my FIOS install today. The tech insisted a router was
>>> necessary
>>> and left me with one. He was unsure how to deal with multiple
>>> static IPs
>>> through the router. The answer was simple, remove the router and
>>> use a
>>> switch.
>>>
>>> By the time it gets to the router, it's just Ethernet and so you
>>> can do
>>> whatever you would normally do with static IP addresses on
>>> Ethernet. The
>>> first thing I did was set up an new Linux server and it all went very
>>> smoothly.
>>>
>>> Scott K
>>>
>>> On Thursday 17 August 2006 21:14, Eldon Ziegler wrote:
>>>> The reason that was given was that the TV guide came out the RF
>>>> feed on
>>>> the router. Without their router you lost the TV guide.
>>>>
>>>> However, I soon found that a static IP address is not available with
>>>> "residential" service; I had to switch to "business" service to
>>>> get a
>>>> static IP address. Actually, I got five static IP addresses. The
>>>> downside is that you can't have TV with business service. Since I no
>>>> longer have TV there might not be a reason to stick with their
>>>> router
>>>> but I haven't pursued that yet. I too found the router interface
>>>> to be
>>>> clunky and non-intuitive.
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, 2006-08-17 at 06:51 -0400, CardinalZin at verizon.net wrote:
>>>>> Eldon,
>>>>> Why would you have to use their router?
>>>>> They just bring ethernet inside and run it to the router.
>>>>> As I recall, they won't replace the router if it dies,
>>>>> so that kinda implies that there's nothing special about it.
>>>>> I do know that I seriously dislike the many-tiered menu
>>>>> system that hide all the freaking settings.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Cardinal Zin <<<
More information about the lug
mailing list