[CALUG] More UDP foolishness
Jason C. Miller
jason.c.miller at gmail.com
Thu Apr 13 23:19:14 CDT 2006
Yeah...but I would hardly call nmap a common utility (at least, not
NEARLY as common as something like telnet). I also mentioned that nmap
is something that I'm using currently and don't want to have to rely
since I don't want to have to install it wherever I go.
-j
Kelly Price wrote:
>On 4/13/06, Jason C. Miller <jason.c.miller at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>Oh...almost forgot. The UDP port in question doesn't reside on your
>>local machine. Therefore, 'netstat' and other tools like that don't
>>apply. ;)
>>
>>
>>
>
>So we're looking at a remotely connected PC.
>
>We need to know where you are connected in relation to that PC, and if
>your laptop has Linux on it.
>
>* If it's on a local network (wire/wireless), nmap.
>* If it's not, but the PC has an direct IP address and so do you, nmap.
>* If ether end is firewalled or behind a NAT router, you're screwed!
>
>
>
>
>
>> -j
>>
>>Jason C. Miller wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>Heck....why not! Here's my random question for the week... :)
>>>
>>>So, anyway, a lot of troubleshooting and investigation is required with
>>>the stuff that I work on. For as long as I can remember, I've used
>>>'telnet' as the simplest way to determine whether or not a TCP port is
>>>bound to by an application on a machine. It's simple, quick, easy, and
>>>comes stock on just about every OS imaginable. It's a good way to
>>>verify that the 3-way-handshake works on a given port.
>>>
>>>However...
>>>
>>>Can't say it's been quite that simple for the UDP side of the house.
>>>Since UDP is connectionless, the mechanisms for determining if a port is
>>>bound to is a tad different. Instead of conveniently getting a
>>>(RST,ACK) TCP reply, UDP relies on the receipt of ICMP 'Destination
>>>Unreachable' messages to tell it that the port is not open. Typically,
>>>I've relied on applications like nmap. However, I don't really feel
>>>like installing it wherever I go. I've also written simple progs to do
>>>it, but it's very inconvenient.
>>>
>>>So, the question is....can anybody recommend a COMMON program that you
>>>would find on most operating systems that could be pointed at an
>>>arbitrary UDP port and would tell you the status of that port? Seems
>>>like it'd be simple, but I can't seem to think of any at the moment.
>>>
>>> -j
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Columbia, Maryland Linux User's Group (CALUG) mailing list
>>>CALUG Website: http://www.calug.com
>>>Email postings to: lug at calug.com
>>>Change your list subscription options: http://calug.com/mailman/listinfo/lug
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>--
>>***************************************************
>>My blog: http://millersplace.blogspot.com/
>>***************************************************
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Columbia, Maryland Linux User's Group (CALUG) mailing list
>>CALUG Website: http://www.calug.com
>>Email postings to: lug at calug.com
>>Change your list subscription options: http://calug.com/mailman/listinfo/lug
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>--
>Kelly "STrRedWolf" Price
>http://strredwolf.furrynet.com
>
>
--
***************************************************
My blog: http://millersplace.blogspot.com/
***************************************************
More information about the lug
mailing list