[CALUG] repartitioning on the fly

[James Ewing Cottrell 3rd]

Threads never die. I don't read this stuff all that regularly, and when 
I do, I try to avoid posting to old threads (and gee, it was only 11 
days old when I posted, not months).

My mind also boggles that you think you can turn being a consultant on 
and off. Indeed, this list would seem to be a prime place to be ON, to 
be looking for business.

But it is you, my friend, who are being Anal Retentive. You are hiding 
behind Labels, and Yes, you are Technically Correct when you say that 
RH4.1 is an ancient unsupported release. But Guess What? The number has 
been usurped by RHEL, and people with less of a memory than us are 
likely to use it Casually and Informally.

Just admit that you are wrong. It's easy to do. You're just resisting 
because you didn't like my original tone. And I can't blame you. After 
all, I am being a jerk about this. But at least I am right.You're being 
a jerk too, and you're wrong.

JIM

Jason Dixon wrote:

> On Nov 17, 2005, at 12:11 AM, James Ewing Cottrell 3rd wrote:
>
>> Clearly you made an assumption. The wrong one. And you posted a  most 
>> un-Consultant-like response.
>
>
> I'm not on this list to consult anyone.  I'm on this list to  
> supplement my interest in the Linux operating system and to meet  
> others in the Columbia area with similar interests in Linux/FOSS.   
> Your anal-retentive participation has suddenly made this much less  
> enjoyable.  Kudos to you.
>
> This was my last reply to this once-dead thread.
>
> -- 
> Jason Dixon
> DixonGroup Consulting
> http://www.dixongroup.net
>
>
>
>
>